How to Participate | Consent and Legal Information | Data and SAC guide | Current Status | Cluster Analysis | References | Links |  


SPEAR (Seismogram Picking Error from Analyst Review)
-
Behavioral Experiment

I am a doctoral student working under Aaron Velasco and a fellowship with the AFRL. I am conducting a study to show the variablity in picking seismograms. I cordially invite you to participate in this experiment, I need all levels of experience so once you have picked the data set, if you work with anyone that has picked seismograms please pass the data set on to them with this information.

The ability to identify and mark Seismic Phases on a seismogram is a fundamental skill that has gone unnoticed with the advent of automatic and sophisticated picking software. Freedman (1966) performed the first detailed experiment comparing picks generated by different Analysts. Since this initial experiment, no further analysis has been completed to understand the current state of human picked seismograms. I am creating a data set of Picked Seismograms from many seismologists and will determine an error model associated with the factors that predict the error associated with picking Seismic Phases.

    How to Participate:

      Please make your initial picks using the script provided (picker.csh). Save results (pick_all.out) by renaming to LastName_pick_all.out. If you use a different tool set or process the seismograms to pick them please repick the data set using your standard procedure (Do not reuse your initial picks). Save these reults by renaming pick_all.out to LastName_processed.out Please attach a brief description of the tools and processing steps used in picking the seismograms. Also I need a brief profile of your experience by answering these questions:

      • Years experience picking:
      • Average number of seismograms picked per year:
      • Number of seismograms picked in last 6 months:
      • Type of seismograms picked: (local, regional, teleseismic, explosions...) list all that apply.

      If you do not use SAC feel free to use which ever program you are comfortable with, I can convert the seismograms to whatever format you need. However, please specify which program you are using and the format of your pick file. The picks will be recorded as follows when using the picker.csh script (for P and S picks please define the quality of the pick using E or I, U or D, 0-4, if you are familiar with this convention):

      • Amarker - P or Pg
      • T0- S or Sg
      • T1- Pn
      • T2- Sn
      • T4- Lg
      • T5- Rg

      If you think you can identify other phases use one of the other T markes and set the KT header value to represent that phase, also make a note in your brief description of the pick.

      When the picks are complete please send me the pick files (LastName_pick_all.out and LastName_processed.out) and the brief description of your picking profile, processing steps/tools, and additional phase you picked to cpzeiler@utep.edu.

TOP OF PAGE

    Data and SAC Guide:

    Current Status:

      # of Analysts 12
      Total # of Picks 647
      # Pg picks 311
      # Sg picks 123
      # Lg picks 153
      TOP OF PAGE

        Cluster Analysis:

          This data is taken from the Earhtquake Studies Offce (ESO) of the Montana Bureau of Mines and Geology. The events below are near Finn, MT and are 28, 33, 52, 108, 105 and 127 km from the stations listed below.

        References:

          Freedman, H. W. (1966). The "Little Variable Factor" statistical discussion of the reading of seismograms, Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, Vol. 56, No. 2, pp. 593-604.

      TOP OF PAGE

        Links:

      TOP OF PAGE
         

 
website web hit counter
Download a free hit counter here.

TOP OF PAGE